Joint Employer
A legal doctrine where two or more businesses share responsibility for the same workers, making all joint employers liable for wage and hour compliance.
What Is a Joint Employer?
A joint employer relationship exists when two or more businesses share control over the same worker's employment. When this relationship is established, ALL joint employers share legal responsibility for wage and hour compliance, including minimum wage, overtime, meal breaks, and rest breaks.
Joint employment is increasingly important in California as businesses use staffing agencies, franchises, contractors, and other arrangements that create complex employment relationships. Understanding joint employer liability helps businesses assess their true legal exposure.
When Joint Employment Exists
Joint employment can arise in several contexts:
Common Joint Employment Arrangements
| Arrangement | Description | Joint Employer Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Staffing agencies | Workers placed at client locations | High - client often controls work |
| Franchises | Franchisor sets policies for franchisee workers | Medium to High |
| Contractors/Subcontractors | General contractor uses subcontractors | Medium to High |
| Management companies | Third party manages operations | High |
| Labor providers | Outsourced workforce | High |
| Parent/Subsidiary | Parent controls subsidiary's employment | Medium |
California's Joint Employer Test
California uses an expansive test based on whether the business:
- Suffers or permits the worker to work
- Engages the worker to perform work
- Exercises control over wages, hours, or working conditions
- Has the power to control employment aspects (even if not exercised)
Unlike some federal tests that focus primarily on direct control, California's approach captures businesses that have indirect influence over employment.
Factors Determining Joint Employment
Control Over Employment Conditions
| Control Factor | Joint Employer Indicator |
|---|---|
| Hiring | Has input on who is hired |
| Firing | Can require worker removal |
| Pay rates | Sets or influences wages |
| Scheduling | Controls when workers work |
| Supervision | Directs daily activities |
| Work methods | Dictates how work is performed |
| Discipline | Can impose or require discipline |
| Training | Provides training requirements |
Economic Dependence
| Factor | Joint Employer Indicator |
|---|---|
| Business integration | Worker essential to operations |
| Capital investment | Business owns facilities/equipment used |
| Profit control | Controls worker's opportunity to profit |
| Permanence | Ongoing, indefinite relationship |
| Skill level | Work requires little specialized skill |
Structural Control
| Factor | Joint Employer Indicator |
|---|---|
| Contract terms | Mandates employment conditions |
| Pricing | Sets prices that determine wages |
| Brand standards | Requires specific operating practices |
| Operational control | Controls business operations |
Joint Employment Scenarios
Scenario 1: Staffing Agency Placement
Situation: ABC Staffing places workers at XYZ Manufacturing. Workers wear XYZ badges, use XYZ equipment, follow XYZ supervisors, and work XYZ schedules. ABC issues paychecks.
Analysis:
| Factor | ABC Staffing | XYZ Manufacturing |
|---|---|---|
| Issues paycheck | Yes | No |
| Controls schedule | No | Yes |
| Supervises work | No | Yes |
| Provides equipment | No | Yes |
| Can terminate | Yes (formally) | Yes (effectively) |
| Sets pay rate | No | Often |
Result: Both ABC Staffing AND XYZ Manufacturing are joint employers. Both are liable for wage and hour violations.
Practical Impact: If XYZ requires workers to skip meal breaks, BOTH companies face liability for break violations—even though ABC issues the paychecks.
Scenario 2: Franchisor-Franchisee
Situation: FastFood Corp franchises restaurants. The franchisor dictates menu, pricing, uniforms, operating hours, quality standards, and provides scheduling software. Individual franchisees hire workers and issue paychecks.
Analysis:
| Factor | Franchisor | Franchisee |
|---|---|---|
| Hires workers | No | Yes |
| Issues paycheck | No | Yes |
| Sets operating hours | Yes | No |
| Determines pricing | Yes | No |
| Provides systems | Yes | No |
| Controls brand standards | Yes | Follows |
Result: Depending on the level of control, the franchisor may be a joint employer. Cases like Patterson v. Domino's Pizza examine whether franchisor control extends to employment conditions.
Key factors for franchisors:
- Mandatory scheduling systems that affect wages
- Required staffing levels
- Wage recommendations or caps
- Training requirements for franchisee employees
Scenario 3: General Contractor - Subcontractor
Situation: General Construction Corp hires PlumbPro as a subcontractor. PlumbPro brings its own employees, but General Construction sets the schedule, provides some equipment, and the site supervisor directs daily activities.
Analysis:
| Factor | General Contractor | Subcontractor |
|---|---|---|
| Employs workers | No | Yes |
| Controls schedule | Yes | Limited |
| Supervises work | Yes | Also yes |
| Provides equipment | Some | Most |
| Quality control | Yes | Also yes |
Result: Joint employment likely exists. General Construction's control over work schedule and supervision creates shared liability.
Scenario 4: Client-Vendor Relationship
Situation: TechCorp contracts with CleanCo for janitorial services. CleanCo employs the janitors, sets their pay, and supervises them. TechCorp only specifies what areas need cleaning and when.
Analysis:
| Factor | TechCorp | CleanCo |
|---|---|---|
| Employs workers | No | Yes |
| Sets pay | No | Yes |
| Supervises | No | Yes |
| Hires/fires | No | Yes |
| Controls methods | No | Yes |
Result: Likely NOT joint employment. TechCorp is simply a customer specifying desired outcomes, not controlling employment conditions.
Liability of Joint Employers
When joint employment exists, ALL joint employers are:
Jointly and Severally Liable
| Obligation | Effect |
|---|---|
| Wage violations | Any joint employer can be sued for full amount |
| Overtime | Both responsible for tracking hours across all work |
| Break violations | Both liable if breaks not provided |
| Penalties | Both subject to penalties |
| Collections | Employee can collect from either/both |
Example: Worker is owed $10,000 in unpaid overtime. They can collect the full $10,000 from the staffing agency, the client company, or split between them.
Specific Joint Employer Obligations
| Area | Obligation |
|---|---|
| Minimum wage | Ensure worker receives at least minimum wage |
| Overtime | Track total hours across all joint employers |
| Meal breaks | Provide compliant meal breaks |
| Rest breaks | Authorize and permit rest breaks |
| Wage statements | Accurate itemized statements |
| Record keeping | Maintain time and pay records |
| Workers' compensation | Coverage for workplace injuries |
| Anti-discrimination | Prevent workplace discrimination |
Combined Hours for Overtime
When a worker has joint employers, hours are combined for overtime purposes:
Example: Combined Hours Calculation
Worker employed by both Staffing Agency and directly by Client Company in same workweek:
| Employer | Hours |
|---|---|
| Staffing Agency | 30 hours |
| Client Company | 15 hours |
| Total | 45 hours |
Overtime calculation: 5 hours of overtime are owed (45 - 40 = 5)
Who pays? Both joint employers share responsibility. Typically allocated proportionally:
- Staffing Agency: 30/45 = 67% of overtime
- Client Company: 15/45 = 33% of overtime
Practical challenge: This requires communication between joint employers about total hours worked.
Protecting Your Business
For Companies Using Staffing Agencies
- Contractual protections: Require agency to indemnify for wage violations
- Compliance verification: Audit agency's wage and hour practices
- Monitor actual practices: Ensure breaks are being provided at your site
- Clear responsibilities: Define which employer handles what
- Insurance: Ensure adequate coverage for employment claims
| Contractual Element | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Indemnification clause | Agency covers costs of their violations |
| Compliance warranties | Agency certifies legal compliance |
| Audit rights | Ability to verify agency practices |
| Insurance requirements | Minimum coverage levels |
| Records access | Obtain time and pay records |
Warning: Contractual protections don't eliminate liability to workers—they only provide a right to seek reimbursement from the other employer.
For Staffing Agencies
- Know your clients: Understand worksite conditions
- Monitor hours: Track total hours including client work
- Break policies: Ensure clients permit required breaks
- Training: Train clients on California requirements
- Documentation: Maintain thorough records
For Franchisors
- Limit employment control: Avoid dictating specific employment practices
- Advisory vs. mandatory: Make employment guidance optional
- Systems separation: Don't provide mandatory scheduling/payroll systems
- Training scope: Focus on product/service, not employment
- Legal review: Have franchise agreements reviewed for joint employer exposure
For General Contractors
- Subcontractor qualification: Verify subcontractor compliance history
- Contract requirements: Require wage and hour compliance
- Separate supervision: Let subcontractors supervise their workers
- Avoid control: Don't dictate how subcontractors manage employees
- Insurance certificates: Require adequate coverage
California-Specific Considerations
Labor Code Section 2810.3
California's "Labor Contractor" law specifically addresses joint employment:
| Provision | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Client employer liability | Clients share liability with labor contractors |
| Specific industries | Construction, agriculture, hospitality focus |
| Documentation | Written contracts required |
| Compliance verification | Clients must verify contractor compliance |
Wage Theft Liability
Under Labor Code Section 2810, businesses contracting for labor cannot avoid liability by using labor contractors if they know or should know of violations.
AB5 Intersection
The ABC test interacts with joint employment:
- If a worker is an employee (not independent contractor), joint employer analysis applies
- Multiple businesses in the chain may all be employers
Responding to Joint Employer Claims
If your business faces a joint employer claim:
Immediate Steps
- Preserve records: Do not destroy any relevant documents
- Legal counsel: Engage employment law attorney
- Investigation: Determine extent of control exercised
- Coordination: Communicate with other potential joint employer
- Insurance: Notify EPLI carrier
Defense Strategies
| Argument | Basis |
|---|---|
| No control | Did not control employment conditions |
| Contractual allocation | Agreement specifies other party responsible |
| Arm's length | Truly independent business relationship |
| Good faith | Relied on other employer's compliance |
Settlement Considerations
- Joint employers often settle together
- Contribution claims between joint employers
- Insurance coverage allocation
- Future relationship considerations
Practical Compliance Checklist
For Businesses Using Third-Party Labor
- Written contract defining responsibilities
- Indemnification and insurance requirements
- Regular compliance audits of partner
- Monitoring of actual worksite conditions
- Communication system for hours tracking
- Break policy enforcement at your location
- Record retention from all parties
For Businesses Providing Labor to Others
- Clear employment policies followed
- Time tracking across all client sites
- Break compliance verification
- Wage statement accuracy
- Records of all client assignments
- Training on client site requirements
- Communication with clients on total hours
Learn more about Timewave: